Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

Chemical corrosive gas testing evaluates the resistance of electronic components, connectors, and protective coatings to polluted industrial atmospheres containing trace gases such as hydrogen sulfide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and chlorine. Performed in accordance with internationally recognized standards including IEC 60068-2-60, ASTM B827, and the ISO 16750 series, this testing helps manufacturers predict product reliability and service life in harsh chemical environments. Accredited third-party laboratories provide mixed flowing gas (MFG) exposure testing, corrosion product analysis, and electrical performance verification for a wide range of industries.

Technical Overview

Chemical corrosive gas testing, also referred to as gas corrosion testing or mixed flowing gas (MFG) testing, is an accelerated environmental test that simulates the long-term effects of contaminated industrial atmospheres on materials, finishes, and electronic assemblies. During exposure, controlled concentrations of corrosive gases such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and chlorine (Cl2) react with metal surfaces under specified temperature and humidity conditions. The resulting chemical reactions form sulfides, oxides, and chlorides that degrade surface appearance, solderability, and electrical contact performance.

This type of testing is particularly critical for silver, copper, tin, nickel, and their alloys, which are widely used in electrical contacts, connector platings, and printed circuit board surface finishes. In real-world environments such as petrochemical plants, wastewater treatment facilities, pulp and paper mills, heavily industrialized urban areas, and data centers with elevated levels of airborne sulfur compounds, even parts-per-billion concentrations of corrosive gases can cause creep corrosion, increased contact resistance, and intermittent or complete electrical failure. Standardized laboratory methods compress years of field exposure into test durations of days or weeks, enabling manufacturers to qualify materials, compare protective coating systems, and validate product designs before market release.

Testing Samples

Electrical Contacts and Connectors

Connector housings, contact springs, terminals, relay contacts, and switch components with plated finishes such as gold over nickel, silver, tin, or palladium alloys are among the most frequently tested items, since contact integrity is directly threatened by corrosive gas attack.

Printed Circuit Boards and Assemblies

Bare PCBs with HASL, ENIG, immersion silver, or OSP finishes, as well as fully populated PCB assemblies, are tested to evaluate the corrosion susceptibility of traces, via structures, solder joints, and exposed copper under realistic atmospheric contaminants.

Semiconductor Devices and IC Packages

Integrated circuits, discrete semiconductors, leadframes, and bond wires are evaluated to assess package hermeticity, lead finish durability, and the risk of silver migration or bond pad corrosion in polluted environments.

Metal Platings, Coatings, and Raw Materials

Metal sheet, wire, plated test coupons, and conformal coating samples are exposed to rank material grades, verify plating thickness and porosity, and qualify barrier layers prior to production release.

Finished Electronic Products

Complete modules such as sensors, control units, power supplies, communication equipment, and charging devices may be tested in their final configuration to confirm overall product resistance to chemically aggressive service environments.

Testing Items

Depending on the applicable specification and product requirements, the following evaluations are typically performed before, during, and after gas exposure:

  • Visual inspection and discoloration or corrosion grading of exposed surfaces
  • Contact resistance measurement before and after exposure
  • Insulation resistance and dielectric withstand verification
  • Mass change (weight gain) determination of test coupons
  • Corrosion product identification and film thickness analysis
  • Surface morphology and elemental composition analysis by SEM/EDS
  • Cross-sectional metallographic examination of plating layers
  • Connector insertion and withdrawal force testing
  • Porosity evaluation of noble metal coatings and assessment of creep corrosion behavior
  • Functional and electrical performance verification of complete assemblies

Testing Methods

Mixed Flowing Gas Testing to IEC 60068-2-60

Test Ke of IEC 60068-2-60 (equivalently EN 60068-2-60, GB/T 2423.51, and JIS C 60068-2-60) defines four test methods in which samples are exposed to flowing gas mixtures at parts-per-billion concentration levels. Method 1 uses hydrogen sulfide combined with sulfur dioxide, Method 2 combines hydrogen sulfide, nitrogen dioxide, and chlorine, while Methods 3 and 4 apply additional gas combinations and severity levels. Typical test conditions are 25°C to 30°C, 70% to 75% relative humidity, and exposure durations of 4, 7, 10, 14, or 21 days, with copper monitor coupons used to verify chamber corrosivity throughout the test.

Single-Gas Exposure Tests

For evaluating contacts and connections against specific contaminants, IEC 60068-2-42 (Test Kc, sulfur dioxide) and IEC 60068-2-43 (Test Kd, hydrogen sulfide), together with their GB/T 2423.19 and GB/T 2423.20 counterparts, expose samples to elevated ppm-level concentrations of a single gas under controlled temperature and humidity for multi-day durations.

Industry-Specific Procedures

ASTM B827 and ASTM B845 provide standardized practices for conducting and interpreting mixed flowing gas tests for electrical contacts and connectors. The ISO 16750 series defines corrosive gas requirements for electrical and electronic equipment installed in road vehicles, supporting automotive qualification programs. These procedures are often combined with preconditioning and subsequent electrical testing to replicate the full service stress profile.

Post-Test Evaluation

Following exposure, samples are examined visually and microscopically, corrosion films are characterized analytically, and electrical parameters are remeasured and compared against pre-exposure baselines. Results are typically assessed against acceptance criteria defined in the product specification, such as maximum allowable contact resistance change or the absence of visible corrosion products beyond a defined severity level.

Applications

Chemical corrosive gas testing supports reliability qualification and material selection across many sectors where equipment must survive atmospheres contaminated with industrial pollutants:

  • Telecommunications infrastructure, including base station hardware and network equipment installed in polluted outdoor environments
  • Automotive electronics, control units, and onboard charging components qualified to ISO 16750 requirements
  • Aerospace and defense equipment intended for operation in chemically aggressive atmospheres
  • Industrial control systems, PLCs, and instrumentation deployed in petrochemical, metallurgical, and power generation plants
  • Data centers and server hardware requiring protection against sulfur-induced creep corrosion of silver-finished boards
  • New energy equipment such as photovoltaic inverters, energy storage systems, and EV charging stations
  • Consumer electronics and connectors intended for global markets with varying ambient air quality

FAQ

What is chemical corrosive gas testing?

It is an accelerated reliability test in which samples are exposed to controlled low concentrations of corrosive gases such as H2S, SO2, NO2, and Cl2 at elevated humidity, in order to reproduce and evaluate the corrosion damage that would occur over years of service in a polluted atmosphere.

How does mixed flowing gas testing differ from salt spray testing?

Mixed flowing gas testing simulates chemically polluted air using trace-level industrial gases and targets mechanisms such as sulfide formation on contacts and finishes, whereas salt spray testing simulates marine or deicing salt environments. The two methods address different corrosion mechanisms and are often both required for comprehensive environmental qualification.

How long does a corrosive gas test take?

Typical exposure durations range from 4 to 21 days depending on the selected method, severity level, and product specification, with additional time required for pre-test conditioning, electrical baseline measurements, and post-test analysis.

Which standards govern this testing?

The most commonly applied standards include IEC 60068-2-60, IEC 60068-2-42, IEC 60068-2-43, ASTM B827, ASTM B845, the ISO 16750 series, and the corresponding GB/T 2423 and JIS C 60068 national adoptions.

What criteria determine whether a sample passes?

Acceptance criteria are defined by the customer specification or applicable product standard and typically include limits on contact resistance change, visual corrosion severity, mass gain of monitor coupons, and preservation of required electrical functionality after exposure.

Can finished products be tested rather than only material coupons?

Yes. Accredited third-party laboratories routinely test complete assemblies in operating or non-operating conditions, which allows the interaction of enclosures, coatings, airflow, and component layout to be evaluated realistically.